You are browsing the archive for Uncategorized.

Daily CPI one step better than inflation targeting

May 16, 2013 in Uncategorized

Daily CPI one step better than inflation targeting

There are no surprises with the Daily CPI. The Daily CPI is always known in advance. The Daily CPI is thus one step better than inflation targeting: it is daily inflation known in advance.
Here are the links to the future daily inflation in the
US,
UK – Daily Reference RPI: Click on Index Ratio data for indexed linked gilts,
Chile (Unidad de Fomento or UF),
Colombia and
Iceland.
Nicolaas Smith
Copyright (c) 2005-2013 Nicolaas J Smith. All rights reserved. No reproduction without permission.

CMUCPP used (not implemented) in low inflationary countries too

May 16, 2013 in Uncategorized

CMUCPP used (not implemented) in low inflationary countries too

CMUCPP was implemented in a number of countries, including Turkey, Russia and Zimbabwe during hyperinflation in terms of IAS 29 since 1990, the year of first implementation of the standard (IAS 29). CMUCPP is currently (2013) being implemented during hyperinflation in Venezuela, Belarus, Ethiopia and Malawi in terms of IAS 29. CMUCPP has been used since 1990  in terms of IAS 29 and is currently being used in terms of IAS 29 by multi-nationals with subsidiaries in hyperinflationary countries, in low inflationary countries too when they consolidated/consolidate the financial statements of these subsidiaries in their consolidated financial statements.
  Nicolaas Smith Copyright
(c) 2005-2013 Nicolaas J Smith. All rights reserved. No reproduction without permission.

Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power is the only accounting model specifically prescribed in IFRS

May 13, 2013 in Uncategorized

Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power is the only accounting model specifically prescribed in IFRS

Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power is implied during hyperinflation in terms of IAS 29. Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power, i.e., restatement required in IAS 29, is the only accounting model specifically prescribed in IFRS.
 ‘At the present time, it is not the intention of the Board to prescribe a particular model other than in exceptional circumstances, such as for those entities reporting in the currency of a hyperinflationary economy.’
Conceptual Framework (2010), Par. 4.65

Nicolaas Smith
Copyright (c) 2005-2013 Nicolaas J Smith. All rights reserved. No reproduction without permission.

Definition of Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power

May 11, 2013 in Uncategorized

Definition of Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power

Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power (CMUCPP) is the maintenance of the constant purchasing power of capital – capital being equal to the real value of net assets – for an indefinite period of time at all levels of inflation and deflation in entities that at least break even in real value – ceteris paribus – in units of constant purchasing power in terms of an index that recognizes all changes in the general price level.

Nicolaas Smith
Copyright (c) 2005-2013 Nicolaas J Smith. All rights reserved. No reproduction without permission

Different forms of Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power

May 11, 2013 in Uncategorized

Different forms of Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power

The following are all forms of Capital Maintenance in Units of Purchasing Power:
1. Indexation in countries with high or hyperinflation
2. Monetary correction in countries with high or hyperinflation.
3. Price-level accounting
4. Price-level restatement by, for example, the Central Bank of Chile.
5. Restatement of Historical Cost or Current Cost financial statements in terms of the measuring unit current at the balance sheet date during hyperinflation (IAS 29).
None of the above would result in ideal Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power with 100 percent of the constant purchasing power of capital maintained if the following condition were not met:
1. Implementation of a daily index (e.g., the Daily CPI) which generally recognizes all changes in the general price level.
Nicolaas Smith
Copyright (c) 2005-2013 Nicolaas J Smith. All rights reserved. No reproduction without permission.

Physical capital maintenance is very different from financial capital maintenance

May 9, 2013 in Uncategorized

Physical capital maintenance is very different from financial capital maintenance

In IFRS the Conceptual Framework (2010), Par. 4.59 (b) states the following:
 ‘Physical capital maintenance. Under this concept a profit is earned only if the physical productive capacity (or operating capability) of the entity (or the resources or funds needed to achieve that capacity) at the end of the period exceeds the physical productive capacity at the beginning of the period, after excluding any distributions to, and contributions from, owners during the period.’
The (1) physical capital maintenance concept is a fundamentally (totally) different capital maintenance concept compared to the two financial capital maintenance concepts, namely (2) financial capital maintenance in nominal monetary units (traditional Historical Cost Accounting) and (3) financial capital maintenance in units of constant purchasing power (restatement as required in IAS 29 during hyperinflation or monetary correction or indexation as widely implemented in Latin America from the early 1960´s to mid the 1990´s and carried on in Chile till 2008).
The Conceptual Framework, Par. 4.57 states:
‘Under a physical concept of capital, such as operating capability, capital is regarded as the productive capacity of the entity based on, for example, units of output per day.’
So, it is all about ‘units of output per day’. An entity must be using ‘units of output per day’ as a measurement basis to maintain its physical capital.
Physical capital maintenance is not just another way or an additional way of looking at or presenting the two financial capital maintenance concepts.
Actual physical capital maintenance is not generally used in any economy. Prof. Rachel Baskerville from Victoria University in New Zealand states in her paper ‘100 Questions and Answers about IFRS’, Question 39:
‘It is equally possible for a company to adopt a concept of physical capital; i.e. the cycle of operation moves from assets/goods to dollar to goods/assets. Some public sector entities consider that their stewardship responsibilities are best served by reporting physical capital maintenance e.g. is the capacity of the waterworks, waste water system etc. in the local town the same as, or better, than it was last year?
Some Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) will be chosen to report this.
The Framework states:  ― ‘Under a physical concept of capital, such as operating capability, capital is regarded as the productive capacity of the entity based on, for example, units of output per day.”

So: physical capital maintenance is not generally about ‘measurements currently reported in balance sheets’. Physical capital maintenance is not often used.
Nicolaas Smith
Copyright (c) 2005-2013 Nicolaas J Smith. All rights reserved. No reproduction without permission.

Inflation only affects monetary items in financial statements

May 8, 2013 in Uncategorized

Inflation only affects monetary items in financial statements

The statement The effects of inflation in financial statements is a very common statement in accounting literature, international accounting standard setting, central banking research and in accounting in general.
Inflation only affects the real value on monetary items and nothing else. Inflation has no effect on the real value of non-monetary items. The stable measuring unit assumption affects the real value of non-monetary items.
What is intended with the statement The effects of inflation in financial statements is to state: The effects of (1) inflation on monetary items and (2) the stable measuring unit assumption on non-monetary items in financial statements.

Nicolaas Smith
Copyright (c) 2005-2013 Nicolaas J Smith. All rights reserved. No reproduction without permission.

Not enough inflation

May 3, 2013 in Uncategorized

Not enough inflation
Paul Krugman
New York Times

Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power is quite and old capital maintenance concept

April 29, 2013 in Uncategorized

Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power is quite and old capital maintenance concept

A form of Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power is implemented whenever capital (equity) is measured in units of constant purchasing power; i.e., whenever indexation or monetary correction or restatement is used. Indexation, under the name “monetary correction” was used mainly in Latin America from the early 1960´s till 2010 when Chile stopped monetary correction. It has been used in Venezuela in the form of IAS 29 from 2009 till the present (2013).
Indexation was not understood as an accounting model, which it, in fact, is. Brazil used measurement in units of constant purchasing power in the form of monetary correction in the form of a government supplied daily index from 1964 till 1994.
Chile used monetary correction (indexation or capital maintenance in units of constant purchasing power) from 1967 till 2010 in terms of their Unidad de Fomento. Chile stopped monetary correction in 2010 in order to conform with IFRS which is almost 100 per cent Historical Cost based during low inflation, high inflation and deflation. IFRS are Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power based during hyperinflation. Chile did not and still does not understand and realize that they stopped Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power in favour of Historical Cost Accounting in 2010.
Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power was originally authorized in IFRS in the original Framework (1989), Par 104 (a) which states: ‘Financial capital maintenance can be measured in either nominal monetary units or units of constant of constant purchasing power? It is currently being implemented in Venezuela, Belarus, Ethiopia and Malawi. Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power is implemented under IAS 29 in the form of restatement of HC or Current Cost financial statements at the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period in terms of the monthly published CPI. Unfortunately this does not result in 100 per cent Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power.
This would be remedied with the use of the generally available Daily CPI. No-one is currently using the Daily CPI for this purpose during hyperinflation or any other level of inflation or deflation. The use of a daily index to measure all non-monetary items and some monetary items in units of constant purchasing power was widely used in Latin American countries from 1964 till 2010.
The IASB regards the use of a daily index which resulted in Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power in Latin America as irrelevant. The IASB is clueless about Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power. Although it is required and gives particular guidance on how to prepare financial statements stated in constant purchasing power units in IAS 29, the IASB Staff Paper 20 for the IFRIC meeting on 22-23 January 2013 states:
“10. Under current IFRS, there is no particular guidance on how to prepare financial statements stated in constant purchasing power units.”

Nicolaas Smith
Copyright (c) 2005-2013 Nicolaas J Smith. All rights reserved. No reproduction without permission.